Creation of Cybook 2416 (actually Gen4) repository
This commit is contained in:
125
net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig
Normal file
125
net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
|
||||
menu "DCCP CCIDs Configuration (EXPERIMENTAL)"
|
||||
depends on IP_DCCP && EXPERIMENTAL
|
||||
|
||||
config IP_DCCP_CCID2
|
||||
tristate "CCID2 (TCP-Like) (EXPERIMENTAL)"
|
||||
depends on IP_DCCP
|
||||
def_tristate IP_DCCP
|
||||
select IP_DCCP_ACKVEC
|
||||
---help---
|
||||
CCID 2, TCP-like Congestion Control, denotes Additive Increase,
|
||||
Multiplicative Decrease (AIMD) congestion control with behavior
|
||||
modelled directly on TCP, including congestion window, slow start,
|
||||
timeouts, and so forth [RFC 2581]. CCID 2 achieves maximum
|
||||
bandwidth over the long term, consistent with the use of end-to-end
|
||||
congestion control, but halves its congestion window in response to
|
||||
each congestion event. This leads to the abrupt rate changes
|
||||
typical of TCP. Applications should use CCID 2 if they prefer
|
||||
maximum bandwidth utilization to steadiness of rate. This is often
|
||||
the case for applications that are not playing their data directly
|
||||
to the user. For example, a hypothetical application that
|
||||
transferred files over DCCP, using application-level retransmissions
|
||||
for lost packets, would prefer CCID 2 to CCID 3. On-line games may
|
||||
also prefer CCID 2.
|
||||
|
||||
CCID 2 is further described in RFC 4341,
|
||||
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4341.txt
|
||||
|
||||
This text was extracted from RFC 4340 (sec. 10.1),
|
||||
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4340.txt
|
||||
|
||||
To compile this CCID as a module, choose M here: the module will be
|
||||
called dccp_ccid2.
|
||||
|
||||
If in doubt, say M.
|
||||
|
||||
config IP_DCCP_CCID2_DEBUG
|
||||
bool "CCID2 debugging messages"
|
||||
depends on IP_DCCP_CCID2
|
||||
---help---
|
||||
Enable CCID2-specific debugging messages.
|
||||
|
||||
When compiling CCID2 as a module, this debugging output can
|
||||
additionally be toggled by setting the ccid2_debug module
|
||||
parameter to 0 or 1.
|
||||
|
||||
If in doubt, say N.
|
||||
|
||||
config IP_DCCP_CCID3
|
||||
tristate "CCID3 (TCP-Friendly) (EXPERIMENTAL)"
|
||||
depends on IP_DCCP
|
||||
def_tristate IP_DCCP
|
||||
---help---
|
||||
CCID 3 denotes TCP-Friendly Rate Control (TFRC), an equation-based
|
||||
rate-controlled congestion control mechanism. TFRC is designed to
|
||||
be reasonably fair when competing for bandwidth with TCP-like flows,
|
||||
where a flow is "reasonably fair" if its sending rate is generally
|
||||
within a factor of two of the sending rate of a TCP flow under the
|
||||
same conditions. However, TFRC has a much lower variation of
|
||||
throughput over time compared with TCP, which makes CCID 3 more
|
||||
suitable than CCID 2 for applications such streaming media where a
|
||||
relatively smooth sending rate is of importance.
|
||||
|
||||
CCID 3 is further described in RFC 4342,
|
||||
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4342.txt
|
||||
|
||||
The TFRC congestion control algorithms were initially described in
|
||||
RFC 3448.
|
||||
|
||||
This text was extracted from RFC 4340 (sec. 10.2),
|
||||
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4340.txt
|
||||
|
||||
To compile this CCID as a module, choose M here: the module will be
|
||||
called dccp_ccid3.
|
||||
|
||||
If in doubt, say M.
|
||||
|
||||
config IP_DCCP_TFRC_LIB
|
||||
depends on IP_DCCP_CCID3
|
||||
def_tristate IP_DCCP_CCID3
|
||||
|
||||
config IP_DCCP_CCID3_DEBUG
|
||||
bool "CCID3 debugging messages"
|
||||
depends on IP_DCCP_CCID3
|
||||
---help---
|
||||
Enable CCID3-specific debugging messages.
|
||||
|
||||
When compiling CCID3 as a module, this debugging output can
|
||||
additionally be toggled by setting the ccid3_debug module
|
||||
parameter to 0 or 1.
|
||||
|
||||
If in doubt, say N.
|
||||
|
||||
config IP_DCCP_CCID3_RTO
|
||||
int "Use higher bound for nofeedback timer"
|
||||
default 100
|
||||
depends on IP_DCCP_CCID3 && EXPERIMENTAL
|
||||
---help---
|
||||
Use higher lower bound for nofeedback timer expiration.
|
||||
|
||||
The TFRC nofeedback timer normally expires after the maximum of 4
|
||||
RTTs and twice the current send interval (RFC 3448, 4.3). On LANs
|
||||
with a small RTT this can mean a high processing load and reduced
|
||||
performance, since then the nofeedback timer is triggered very
|
||||
frequently.
|
||||
|
||||
This option enables to set a higher lower bound for the nofeedback
|
||||
value. Values in units of milliseconds can be set here.
|
||||
|
||||
A value of 0 disables this feature by enforcing the value specified
|
||||
in RFC 3448. The following values have been suggested as bounds for
|
||||
experimental use:
|
||||
* 16-20ms to match the typical multimedia inter-frame interval
|
||||
* 100ms as a reasonable compromise [default]
|
||||
* 1000ms corresponds to the lower TCP RTO bound (RFC 2988, 2.4)
|
||||
|
||||
The default of 100ms is a compromise between a large value for
|
||||
efficient DCCP implementations, and a small value to avoid disrupting
|
||||
the network in times of congestion.
|
||||
|
||||
The purpose of the nofeedback timer is to slow DCCP down when there
|
||||
is serious network congestion: experimenting with larger values should
|
||||
therefore not be performed on WANs.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
endmenu
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user