- Moved it to ttf-fonts directory.
- Rename to ttf-takao.
- Use ttf.inc instead of rewrite do_install.
Signed-off-by: Lei Maohui <leimaohui@fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
This is the result of automated script (0.9.1) conversion:
oe-core/scripts/contrib/convert-overrides.py .
converting the metadata to use ":" as the override character instead of "_".
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Current version 0.80 is no longer available with the link in the recipe.
Update it to use 0.83 version.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gomez <daniel@qtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
When using doxygen together with the "dot" tool (graphviz package), a
ttf font package is additionally required.
Probably this change could also be moved to ttf.inc.
Signed-off-by: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Add both B/W and color emojis fonts from the noto-emoji project.
Important note for the color emojis to render the pixmap PACKAGECONFIG
option needs to be set in freetype package.
Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Since the new version does not have the file LICENSE, change the
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM to COPYRIGHT.TXT.
Signed-off-by: Zang Ruochen <zangrc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
This change makes the parsing go though, we still might have build
issues, which will be reported in world builds seprately
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Roboto is an Apache licensed sans-serif typeface family developed by Google as
the system font for its mobile operating system Android, and released in 2011
for Android 4.0 "Ice Cream Sandwich".
Signed-off-by: Diego Rondini <diego.rondini@kynetics.com>
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
* add meta-oe/licenses/ttf-mplus from ttf-mplus/027-r4/mplus-TESTFLIGHT-027/LICENSE_E
* use BPN to use the same LICENSE even with multilib
* use the same license name from ttf-vlgothic
* fixes following warnings:
WARNING: ttf-mplus-027-r4 do_populate_lic: ttf-mplus: No generic license file exists for: ttf-mplus in any provider
WARNING: ttf-vlgothic-20141206-r0 do_populate_lic: ttf-vlgothic: No generic license file exists for: mplus in any provider
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
The checksums of the fedora25 rpm do not match those
in the recipe. We use the fedora24 version instead.
The extracted gz file is the same for both versions.
Signed-off-by: Joe Slater <jslater@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
1) Upgrade ttf-dejavu from 2.35 to 2.37.
2) Modify LIC_FILES_CHKSUM, since the date in it has been changed, But the LICENSE has not been changed.
Signed-off-by: Wang Xin <wangxin2015.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Add an extra ttf font vlgothic.
The font is derived from from M+ FONTS which is created by M+ FONTS
PROJECT and under the Free license. So it has to obey the mplus licence.
Signed-off-by: Kai Kang <kai.kang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
PT Sans is an open source licensed font released in 2010 by ParaType.
The ParaTypeFFL-1.3 license file has been submitted to OE-core.
Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Fix following QA error:
,----
| WARNING: Recipe ttf-sazanami, LICENSE (Public domain) has invalid
| format, LICENSES must have operator "([&|() ])" between them.
`----
Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <otavio@ossystems.com.br>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
* there is only ttf-dejavu-common
* fixes following warnings:
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-black rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-heavy rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1c-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1m-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1m-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1m-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1m-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1m-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1mn-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1mn-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1mn-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1mn-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1mn-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-black rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-heavy rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-1p-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-black rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-heavy rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2c-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2m-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2m-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2m-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2m-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2m-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-black rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-bold rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-heavy rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-light rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-medium rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-regular rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
ttf-mplus-027: ttf-mplus-2p-thin rdepends on ttf-common but it isn't a build dependency? [build-deps]
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Fix LICENSE value to drop warning messages:
WARNING: ttf-dejavu: No generic license file exists for: Bitstream in any provider
WARNING: ttf-dejavu: No generic license file exists for: Vera in any provider
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Crapet <Matthieu.Crapet@ingenico.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Changes:
- rename SUMMARY with length > 80 to DESCRIPTION
- rename DESCRIPTION with length < 80 to (non present tag) SUMMARY
- drop final point character at the end of SUMMARY string
- remove trailing whitespace of SUMMARY line
Note: don't bump PR
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Crapet <Matthieu.Crapet@ingenico.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
* Remove all PR = "r0" from all .bb files in meta-oe repo. This was done
with the command sed -e '/^PR.*=.*r0\"/d' meta*/recipes*/*/*.bb -i
* We've switching to the PR server, PR bumps are no longer needed and
this saves people either accidentally bumping them or forgetting to
remove the lines (r0 is the default anyway).
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
It's not necessary to specify the protocol parameter when it's the
default protocol for the fetcher, e.g. the default protocol for
git fetcher it git, "protocol=git" isn't needed.
Signed-off-by: Jackie Huang <jackie.huang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
